According to a Fitch Ratings report on May 16, corporates
have spent the past decade distributing capital through acquisitions—an effort
that protects their credit quality and proved effective last year. NAFTA negotiations
began in 2017 at a time when borrowing was “robust” but “competitive” in
Mexico. If NAFTA dwindles, Fitch said, the sectors most at risk are retail,
real estate, transportation and energy.
“The effect on individual issuers, however, will vary on
factors, including what portion of their production facilities are overseas,
particularly those that are in the U.S., and the effectiveness of their debt
and cash flow currency hedging,” Fitch noted.
NACM Economist Chris Kuehl, Ph.D., said some kind of NAFTA
deal is close, citing four possible outcomes for the agreement between the
U.S., Canada and Mexico. The first “quick but partial” option would focus on
the automotive sector, while the second option would include extending the
deadline beyond May 17 into late summer. Kuehl described the third option as a
continuation of “hyperbole and drama.”
A “total rewrite” is yet another option but probably the
least likely since it’s not supported by Canada or Mexico, he said.
“It has been the stated goal of the Trump administration
that a new deal be in place by the end of the year and there needs to be time
for Congress to get in the game,” Kuehl said. “The odds right now seem to favor
option two, with the assertion that deals on automotive and agriculture be
promulgated.”
-Andrew Michaels, editorial associate
No comments:
Post a Comment